Friday, September 25, 2009
BBQ/All-Star Game Cancelled
The City of Richmond will present us with our trophies for winning the championship at this event. I hope everyone will be able to attend. My daughter, Shannon, and I will be there.
Sunday, September 13, 2009
No softball? Let there be bowling!
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
SAT SEPT 5
Monday, September 7, 2009
Visalia Rawhide 5, Stockton Ports 4
Friday, September 4, 2009
WEDNESDAY GAME VS CITY
Thursday, September 3, 2009
Stockton Ports Game Update
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
Monday, August 24, 2009
NEXT OUTING
Sunday, August 23, 2009
Stockton Ports Game
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
Master Batters vs. Terminal Digits
There was some discussion in the stands about three controversial rulings in yesterday's game. I witnessed two of them and one of them was definitely a blown call by the umpire. I didn't have a clear view of the second one but my impression was that the umpire made the correct call. The third one I did not witness because I was beyond the centerfield fence taking some pictures. I'll get to that one last.
Friday, August 14, 2009
A Request
Interested In Batting Practice This Weekend?
Thursday, August 13, 2009
PLAYOFF GAME VS MOD SQUAD
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Dream Team Quits, PC Bricks win 7-0
Friday, August 7, 2009
Umpire's fee
Thursday, August 6, 2009
How was Pete's Place?
Wednesday, August 5, 2009
We were crushed but there's no need to panic
Thursday, July 30, 2009
RIDING OFF IN THE SUNSET
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
JULY 28 GAME VS DREAM TEAM
Friday, July 24, 2009
How would you like a new bat?
Thursday, July 23, 2009
We Could Clinch Next Week
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Clueless Critics Continue to Show Their Ignorance
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
TSC Outlaws Seize Opportunities, Prevail 9-8
Monday, July 13, 2009
Good luck!
Thursday, July 9, 2009
Whither Goest Derrick?
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
What should we work on today?
Monday, July 6, 2009
July 7th Game VS TD's Postponed
Friday, July 3, 2009
To Postpone or Not to Postpone?
2. must be included on a list of approved bat models published by the ASA National Office; or 3. must, in the sole opinion and discretion of the umpire, have been manufactured prior to 2000 and if tested, would comply with the ASA bat performance standards then in effect. Beginning January 1, 2004, all bats in ASA Championship Play must pass the ASA 2004 bat standard. All bats having the 2004 certification mark will be allowed in ASA Championship Play. Bats that have the 2000 certification mark will not be allowed in ASA Championship Play unless they are listed on an approved bat list on the ASA website. For convenience, the ASA website has a listing of bats that do not pass the ASA 2004 bat standard. ______________________________________ There is a good reason for the ASA's bat testing and certification program. In recent years, advanced technology and materials have led to the manufacture of bats that provide enhanced hitting power. In the hands of a powerful hitter these high-tech bats can be highly dangerous, especially at the lower amateur levels such as ours. Finally, the ASA began testing these new titanium and carbon-aluminum composite bats and outlawed those capable of propelling the ball so hard and fast as to be a threat to pitchers and other players positioned close to the hitter. In our league, all composite bats, even those bearing the ASA certification marks, are banned. You may have noticed that item #3 allows the umpire to make the call on the inclusion of older bats. If they had ruled the bats were not manufactured before 2000 or that they had been modified, or believed they might be manufactured with materials that would not allow them to meet ASA certification, we would have no choice but to accept their judgment. They would have been wrong but we had to live with it. But that isn't what they ruled. They tossed the bats because they didn't bear the 2004 certification mark. This was an incorrect ruling. Unless someone invented the time machine while I was away, it's impossible for a bat manufactured in 1989 to bear a 2004 certification mark. Both the Easton S6 and SX1 were on the ASA's approved bat list. We tried to explain this to the umpires but they wouldn't listen.
The irony here is that by allowing the 2004 certification mark to be their only guideline, the umpires could allow any number of illegal composite bats to be used while they are banning perfectly safe and legal old aluminum bats. They are defeating the entire purpose of the ASA's bat testing and certification program. But I digress.
So we were left to play the game with only two bats. The TD's didn't feel confident they could beat us on the field so they had to pull a lame stunt to put us at a disadvantage. Fine. They still couldn't beat us and in the end, their skullduggery completely backfired. The following weekend Gary and I went on a shopping binge to load up the team with certified bats of every weight from 23 oz. to 34 oz. From that point forward, we had the equipment to allow each of our players to find a bat with which he/she was really comfortable. Now you have the background. Knowing this, have the TD's demonstrated the kind of sportsmanship that makes them deserving of a any favors?